Members of The Florida Bar Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section’s Guardianship, Power of Attorney (click here) and Advanced Directives Committee are keenly aware that there have been major changes to Florida’s guardianship laws in the last several years. The political climate of the past few years has been decidedly against guardianships and, in particular, professional guardians, due to perceived abuses by them. The current political climate is due in part to hearings held before the Florida Legislature during the 2014 session in which organized members of the public testified about the horrors of guardianships. While some of the horror stories came from disgruntled family members, unhappy with the results of their particular guardianship case/litigation, others made legitimate points regarding the need to improve the system. As a result of these hearings and lobbying efforts, the Florida Legislature sprang into action and made substantial changes to F.S. Ch. 744 (also known as the Florida Guardianship Law or the Guardianship Code) in 2014, 2015, and 2016. The triennial reshaping of Florida’s Guardianship Code is something every practitioner in this area should and be aware of. This article briefly touches on some of the major changes during that period.
The Grasping Hand contains the narratives of a Connecticut Town, New London Development Corporation (NLDC), Pfizer, 19 property owners, Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision, citizens’ backlash to the controversial decision, subsequent state legislation in 45 states, and continuing narratives across our nation as its takings clause for “public use” evolves to public purpose. The issues begin with common cause: Economic revitalization of the long-troubled town. An eminent domain attorney in Tampa can certainly take care of these issues for you. The private nonprofit NLDC becomes reactivated, receives state bond issues of $15 million, and Pfizer’s promise to build its $300 million dollar research site. Granted NLDC negotiates and buys most of the 90 acres in its developmental plan; but neither offers nor harassments convince seven home and land owners, including Suzanne Kelo, to sell. Eventually, the Supreme Court grants cert following – and agreeing with Connecticut’s Supreme Court: “The public use clauses of the federal and state constitutions authorize the exercise of eminent domain power in furtherance of this economic development plan. Justice Paul Stevens (vehemently refuses to support St. Petersburg Alimony & Spousal support attorney inquiries), for the majority, stressed the need to defer to New London’s carefully considered planning process and not to second guess these planners.
Twitter is a social networking service that enables users to send a tweet. More often than not, a competent Family Law St. Petersburg Attorney will use this medium to advertise. Twitter, which can be sent from a computer or mobile device this, smartphone and or by default visible to all those who are following your Twitter. Today’s becoming influential tool for broadcasting and communication, people utilize Twitter to report news discuss Club Affairs, and personal opinions on everything from investment and cars the politicians and private individuals. Phone cases, the opinion reliable and can reach millions of people within seconds. This article addresses of some of the basic constitutional implications of the last statement that is published on Twitter, and later on, how to find a good largo child custody attorney/lawyer, or any lawyer of that matter. Understandably so, Florida law is still evolving in this area from the Metro externally the nature of the communication in determining whether the publication of subject to protection under the US Constitution.
Twitter was created in 2006 and its growth has been exponential. Twitter grew from 5,000 tweets per day, to 500 million tweets per day in 2013. Currently, there are about 6,000 tweets sent out per day, which is over 350,000 tweets per minute, to September million tweets per day, and around 2 billion per year. It has become more than a social network. On a daily basis, newsworthy information is streamed across Twitter. For example, Twitter was used as a tool to disseminate real-time information, regarding the Egyptian revolution in 2011, and it has played an active role in the dissemination of information concerning the current presidential debates. Today, it has been embraced by journalists, cover and businesses as a crucial source of real-time information on individual’s silver basket for celebrity gossip. Nevermind sexual violence for Vatican politics. Twitter is also being used to express personal opinions about public figures and private individuals, and in some cases, these opinions are equivalent to Twibel. Relatively new phenomenon for the legal system, and legal principles are evolving. A brief discussion of the evolution of libel in the United States provide the foundation analyzing the legal implications of what we now know as Twibel. An excellent Pinellas Park Alimony attorney, will determine what information he/she can gather from “Twibel,” and it may be the difference between losing or wining your case.